Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Annihilation of Germany – for the Good of Mankind (Part 1)

The Storm of War – Andrew Roberts(2009)
Annihilation of Germany – for the Good of Mankind (Part 1)

The book is about the Second World War.

It is an amazing book, as the author has been able to cover the entire canvas of the war in his concise 700 page book. Roberts does not accept any dogma or hearsay. All facts are checked and sources confirmed and only balanced opinions expressed.

But you know what they say – the book is after all the ‘victors’ version. What would history read like if Hitler or the Japanese had subdued the allies? Its difficult to say- but it is not too far fetched to believe that in all possibility, before the turn of the 20th century we would have had the mother of all wars –‘the Third World War’ with nuclear pyrotechnics thrown in for our entertainment.

Amongst the multitude of figures churned out by the author, the one figure that stuck my mind was this- a staggering 50 million people perished in the war.

27 million Russians alone died in the conflict – more than the population of present day Australia.

The first world war saw a mere trifling 16 million deaths in comparison.

For the good of mankind- annihilation of Germany

The root cause of the war was not Hitler alone as one has been brought up to believe – but the state of the German nation since the mid 19th century.

Germany/Prussia had unleashed no fewer than five wars of aggression since 1864.

Under Bismarck’s policy of ‘Blood and Iron’, first it was Denmark(1864) then Austria(1866) and finally the humiliating loss of France of its territories Alsace and Lorraine(1871).

Kaiser Wilhelm goaded the Military commanders and the aristocracy into the Great War in 1914, followed by Hitler –the prime architect of the Second World War.

Why did Germany produce so many war mongerers?

Post the Franco-Prussian war of 1871, the Germans came to believe themselves to be a “Civilization superior to all other civilizations; and hence it was the duty of Germany to civilize and Germanize the world”

"God has called us to civilize the world," declared Kaiser William "we are the missionaries of human progress."

So for people believing themselves to be superior beings, they found it hard to digest the fact that they did not possess colonies like France and Great Britain.

Systematically they began preparing for war. Post 1871, the German schools mutilated facts of history and taught their children that :-

France was a nation of weaklings;

Russia a nation of slaves;

England, a nation of tradesmen, where war was not glorified, a "colossus with feet of clay," whose world empire would crumble before the German might.

America, peace-loving, idealistic, defenseless America, was to be taught her proper and subordinate place in a world ruled by German power.

The powerful military leaders, aided by the German press, preached the doctrine that war is a necessity, "an ordinance of God for the weeding out of weak and incompetent individuals and States."

In 1918 even after the surrender of Germany in the First World War, the German Army (at the lower level) and the German people strongly believed that the surrender was a sellout by the Kaiser and the German nation was not defeated.

This aspect was carefully cultivated by Hitler to cultivate the myth of the supremacy of the German race. The roots of militarism had not been weeded out and the German people thirsted for a war to avenge their humiliation in 1918. Hitler understood this and he nurtured and stoked this thirst.

The only way to have a lasting peace would be a total, comprehensive and humiliating defeat to be inflicted on Germany.

And that is exactly what happened when the end came for Germany. They had their backs to the wall with both the allied and the Russian forces at their doorsteps when Hitler committed suicide. Almost all German towns were pulverized in air raids and a million civilians perished. After six long years the people who carved for the war were saying ‘enough is enough’.

The hunger for power and war had been extricated from the roots and the defeat was total in all respects. And that is the reason we see the Germany of today – a pacifist, democratic and peaceful Germany- who are saying no to bombing Libya and other adventures undertaken by US & co.

If you have seen the movie ‘Valkryie’ starring Tom Cruise, then you would have been amongst those who bemoaned as to how Hitler escaped the assassination attempt by Strauffenberg (portrayed by Tom Cruise) in 1944 and how peace would have reigned if Hitler had been assassinated.

Actually, in retrospect, it was good fortune that Hitler survived the assassination attempt in 1944 by Col Von Strauffenberg. If Hitler had not survived the attempt and a negotiated peace reached with Germany, the myth that the German nation was not defeated but been sold out by a clique of Aristocrats, Capitalists, Jews, defeatists etc would have been propagated as had happened at the end of the first world war. It would have laid the foundation for a third world war, which would have finished all of mankind.

In any case Strauffenberg was hardly the ‘ideal democrat’ or the ‘bravest of the best’ as Churchill believed. Far from it – he despised the lie that ‘all men are equal’ ,believed the polish to be ‘an unbelievable rabble of Jews and Mongrels’. He even got married carrying his steel helmet. He would have been an ideal replacement for Hitler and we would not have noticed the difference.

Its times like this ,when you read history, when you actually start believing that maybe ‘God does not move in mysterious ways’ and everything is a part of a grand design revealed only in retrospect.

Read history and not religious books, I say , and maybe you will have a more healthy opinion on the existence of the almighty.

8 comments:

  1. very insightful and well written man. i was watching a documentary sometime ago in which they said that as the russian army advanced into germany, over a span of a few days, no less than 2 million women were raped, resulting in huge numbers of suicides. the sheer brutality of it is gut-wrenching. i suppose in war, both sides lose. just a question of who loses less. i've also heard a contrarian view about schindler's altruism. seems he profited hugely by selling free jewish labour to german companies. yet to verify this on the net but if it were me, i'd take schindler's option any day above the gas chambers. you rekindled my interest in the second world war. virtually everything in the world changed during and after the war. women's emancipation got a boost in western countries. as many men died, the demand for labour saw women taking up factory and other jobs. the subsequent baby-boomer generation rebelled against the mores and ideals of their parents' generation which is reflected heavily in rock and roll music. thus, the emancipation of youth too can atleast partially trace its roots to the great war. the migration of most of the best artists in europe to america during the war ensured that new york would eventually be on par with paris in terms of being the art capital of the world. probably, the one migration from nazi europe that changed world history in the long term even more than hitler's rule of terror was that one time swiss patent office clerk's decision to move to america...we all know what that resulted in.....:)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I will make it a point to read this book.
    Post declassification of confidential documents lot is coming to light since unknown. I have inputs about new lesser known dimensions from the following
    The Berlin Museum - spent three long days
    Churchill;s secret war - a best seller in india.
    The History of the Peoples of United States- includes the genocide of the Native Indians
    I have yet to get any literature of what the english crimal banished white man has done to the Abirogin so far in Australia
    Of the number of people who died in Russia = how many were the victims of German war & Gestapo machine and how many of NKVD will never be known. Stalin was as cruel as , Hiltler Churchill, Teddy Roosevelt and a number of American Presidents.
    If one dwells into the history of Europe & England, it is full of wars between various Kingdoms and Principality perpetuated by the aristrocats/corporates(Dick Chenney)England. The same is the case with our sub continient.
    Nevertheless I wll read this book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Hemanth iam not really sure about rape by the German soldiers,they were a disciplined force. but for sure the japs were truly a medieval force as far as their bestiality,torture ,rapes etc goes. once again iam glad japs were stopped near Kohima/Imphal ...iam not too sure the fate of India would have been any different from what China went through when they were under Jap occupation.
    But for sure germans were totally brutal with the Russian POWs and of course the local population in the baltic states,poles,the other Slav pockets. If Hitler was smart he could have played up the discontent of the locals with the communist regime under Stalin and fought a coordinated battle instead of being a case of 'germans and the rest' in Europe.
    Incidentally the brutal treatment of POWs by the Germans was one of the reasons why the Russian fought till the end.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Hemanth i will post further blogs on the book. there were too many nuggets of information to be fitted onto one blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @OG its true that the absolutely unbiased history has never been written. we need to search for their version to get an objective version most definitely.any suggestions?

    ReplyDelete
  6. anoop, it was the russians who raped as they advanced into germany according to the documentary. the numbers may have been speculation but i am sure it must have happened.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Huge loss of lives looks like was not direct result of military action. Cutting out the logistcs/food supply to entire regions was tacticts used by both, most deaths occured due to extreme cold and lack of food. Russian comarades to uphold their ideologies fought along with the soviet army, these comrades had no prior battlefield exposure or sufficient training resulting in heavy casualties, also to be noted is the huge russian civilian participation in the battles. Russians could not have held up against a militarily superior Germany, sacrificing lives was their option. They were used to such extreme cold conditions and could predict it, whereas Germans with their metal caps and all weather uniforms could not tolerate the bitter cold. Even though the Germans made swift gains initially, they could not sustain an unexpected long drawn battle.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @anonymous right you are. the huge loss of lives were not just result of direct military action. For instance In the 900 day seige of Leningrad a million people died i.e approx 1,100 people per day.

    ReplyDelete